Illustrative scenarios based on the types of mandates we handle. Client identities and specific figures are not disclosed.
Developer Finance · Phased Structuring
₹22 Cr
Completed and incomplete projects separated into two fundable phases
The Situation
A residential developer mixed completed and under-construction buildings into one loan request — creating a mixed-risk proposal that lenders repeatedly rejected.
The Structure
We phased the requirement. Completed properties secured ₹12 Cr first. That capital funded construction completion, which unlocked Phase 2 approval.
₹12 Cr disbursed (Phase 1) · ₹10 Cr approved (Phase 2)
Big-Ticket Home Loan · HNI Profile
₹18 Cr
HNI borrower with strong assets but income not visible on ITR
The Situation
A senior professional buying a high-value home had significant net worth but declared ITR income that didn't reflect repayment capacity. Two banks had declined.
The Structure
We repositioned using asset statements and investment portfolio evidence at a lender whose methodology accounts for HNI profiles. Sanctioned in 45 days.
₹18 Cr · Rate: 8.85% · 20-year tenure
Society Redevelopment · Developer Finance
₹15 Cr
Redevelopment project funded from DA signing through construction
The Situation
A Mumbai developer signed a DA with a housing society but had no capital to begin. Strong fundamentals — prime micro-market — but no cash flow to show lenders.
The Structure
We built the case around projected revenue from the free-sale component, mapped phase-wise cash flows, and approached an NBFC with appetite for early-stage redevelopment.
₹15 Cr sanctioned · Construction commenced in 60 days
LAP Refinancing · Rate Reduction
₹25 Cr
High-rate LAP refinanced and topped up against the same collateral
The Situation
A business owner was servicing ₹22 Cr LAP at 13.5% taken during financial stress. Business had stabilised, property had appreciated — the rate no longer matched the profile.
The Structure
Balance transfer to a private lender at 10.25% with a ₹3 Cr top-up against current valuation. Monthly outflow reduced by ₹1.8 Lakh from day one.
₹25 Cr (BT + top-up) · 10.25% · EMI saving ₹1.8L/mo
Lease Rental Discounting · Commercial LRD
₹12 Cr
Commercial landlord monetised future rentals without disturbing tenancy
The Situation
A commercial property owner with a long-term blue-chip lease needed capital for business expansion. Selling was off the table; a standard LAP would have cost more.
The Structure
LRD facility structured against the rental stream, tenure aligned to the lease period. Tenancy undisturbed. Capital available within six weeks of mandate.
₹12 Cr · 9-year tenure · Tenancy unaffected
Developer Finance · Completion Capital
₹8 Cr
Stalled project funded on future brand revenue, not current status
The Situation
A developer had a partially complete project and an MOU with a recognised brand for commercial use. Construction had stalled; no lender would fund on current status.
The Structure
Funding case built around the brand MOU and projected commercial revenue. Project restarted within 90 days; additional funding approved in-principle shortly after.
₹8 Cr sanctioned · ₹5 Cr additional in-principle approved